423.org.uk

Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control
Experimentation
by Julianne McKinney
Director, Electronic Surveillance Project
Association of National Security Alumni
December 1992
Whither the KGB?
In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight of dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on a means by which the U.S.
Government might most effectively intervene. highlights of these discussions are reported in"Understanding the Solzhenitzyn Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS, 1974). KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these discussions. It was noted that the KGB's suc-cess depended on the extensive use of informant networks and agent provocateurs; and, followingBrezhnev's rise to power, on the use of drugs and psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation and con-trol. Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related tactics were also cited as serving KGBpurpose. Participants in the conference agreed that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide and isolate thepopulace, to spread fear, and to silence dissenters. Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed precisely these same tactics on a recur-rent basis. The Church and Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an end tothese practices. Based on recent developments, it would appear that the CIA's and FBI's OperationsMKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and Vice-President-level Hearings) were instead merely driven underground. We are now in contact with a total of 25 individu-als, scattered throughout the United states, who firmly believe they are being harassed by agencies of theU.S. Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom we will be contacting in the future. Themajority of these individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance began in 1989. The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns bear a striking resemblance to thoseattributed to the CIA and FBI during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The onlydifference now is that electronic harassment and experimentation also appear to be (more blatantly)involved. The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death rattle, and the KGB no longer poses thethreat which purportedly served to justify the U.S. Government's resort to such operations as MKULTRA,MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been reduced to an increasingly distant mem-ory.
Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in this country suggest that the KGB, asan institution, was never the real threat. A KGB "mentality," which is underlying pragmatic contempt forcivil liberties, appears, instead, to have been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COIN-TELPRO, and the operations now being reported to us. The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not ideology. Its objective is power and control,regardless of human cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on fear, conformity and gov-ernment funding. Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these complaints of government harass-ment and experimentation with an admitted "high degree of caution." We are no longer skeptical. Thegrowing numbers of independent complaints and the similarities between those complaints cannot beignored. Under the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a "mentality," the KGB appears tobe accomplishing more in "burying this country" from within, than it could ever have hoped to haveachieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has a serious problem on its hands which needsto be resolved. Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July edition of the association's publication,Unclassified, preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention as of July 1992. Our objec-tive, as noted, was to weigh the legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy technologiesreportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and covert patterns of harassment identified as a result ofour investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to limit the success of such operations in thefuture, by according them widespread publicity.
In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor their privacy and because our investiga-tions have not been completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our focus is on the similaritiesof the complaints being received – similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the FBI,local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric professions, and organizations such as theACLU and Amnesty International have so far chosen to ignore. We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability is being accorded purported victims of UFOexperiences and spectral visitations, than to persons who complain of systematic harassment and experi-mentation by the U.S. Government, involving technologies which the U.S. Government is only now grudg-ingly admitting to possess. These complaints require investigation. In due course (and provided financialsupport is obtained), we hope to be able to acquire the technology and supportive medical expertise to sub-stantiate the claims being made. We also hope to alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can betrusted. History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise. The Problem Surfaces
Reprinted form the June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol. IV, No. 3), published by The Association of National The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline University's "Public Administration" report on the resolution of MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although the shocking details of medical ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian governments were amply detailed, Washington and Ottawa– citing national security and government privilege – stalled for so long that cases never came to trial. Thesurviving victims settled for a pittance in an out-of-court settlement. Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable, the door was left open for possible resump-tion of similar "mind-control" activities. In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some half-dozen people had contacted us withappeals for assistance in ending what they believe to be electronic harassment and mind-control experi-mentation, possibly involving the CIA. We decided to take a closer look at the situation. We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals throughout the United States who appear tobe targets of harassment and mind-control experimentation involving directed-energy technologies. [Bymid-November 1992, the number had increased to 25.] Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves" and of "hearing voices" are stigmatizedas psychotic, delusional or schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the treatment accordedUFO and psychic phenomena "freaks," we approach this subject with a high degree of caution. Based onour preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected individuals, we conclude that the mat-ter is serious and should be pursued further.
THE EXISTING DIRECTED-ENERGY ARSENAL
Our first step was to determine what, if any technology exists which might be used for electronic harass-ment. The information was found in a "white paper" published in 1991 by the U.S. Global Strategy Council– a Washington-based organization, under the chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of theCIA, who maintains very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community. The "white paper" describes theforeign and domestic uses foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic radiators, infrasound, non-nuclear electro-magnetic pulse generators, and high-powered microwave emitters. The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is misleading. the energy emitted from all of theseweapons can kill people when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of amplified, they can causeextreme forms of physical discomfort and debilitation. The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as "non-conventional." They were soidentified in an exhibit at a DA-sponsored symposium on "The Soldier As A System," in Crystal City, VA,on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were separately mentioned during the symposium as being ofparticular interest to the U.S. Marine Corps. We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons with Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of theexhibit and the Army's delegate to NATO in matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A System." Mr. Shisleracknowledged not only that directed-energy weapons are in the DoD's arsenal, but also that the American soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects, should they be employed in the battlefield. The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing researchinto effective countermeasures. Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy Council's complete project proposal onthis subject: (Title: Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and Employing Nonlethal Means in aNew Strategic Era, prepared by Janet Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified, elu-sive "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the potential domestic applications of this "non-lethal" technol-ogy invite serious consideration by the public at large. The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, (202) 466-6029. BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION
Research into biological and psychological effects of exposure to microwave radiation is voluminous. TheU.S. public has been led to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research. The fact is, the CIAand DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly pursued precisely the same research since commencementof Project Pandora in the 1950's. The current primary users of this research appear to be the CIA, DoD, theNational Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Energy (DoE). The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has participated in this research since ProjectPandora. In 1973, WRAIR discovered that externally-induced auditory input could be achieved by meansof pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of spoken words' sounds. The effect on the receiving end isthe (schizophrenic) sensation of "hearing voices" which are no part of the recipients' own thought process-es. The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and theFoundation of Life," by Robert O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY, 1985):"Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with 'voices'or deliver undetected instructions to a programmed assassin." This research has continued, and the results are published in various publicly available scientific and tech-nical journals. Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James C., Electromagnetic InteractionWith Biological Systems (Plenum Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department ofBioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a number of books and articles on this sub-ject. (He has more recently informed us that he had designed the experiment referred above in Dr. Becker'sbook.) WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of exposure to high power microwave radi-ation. WRAIR presented a paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW [microwave]Weapons" at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, in mid-1989. A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting with auditory effects of pulsedmicrowave audiograms. Also, recent statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the Walter Reed ArmyMedical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatientswith microwaves. This, too, is a matter to us. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT
The Government's past record of abuses in the area of civil rights is well documented. Within the past 30years alone, we have witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive Orders and implementingregulations were published which prohibited military and CIA domestic covert intelligence operations.
Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the surveillance of / collection of personal information onU.S. citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also prohibited. Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with these (quasi-) legal prohibitions. Wehave evidence that this is not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in this case, no laws enact-ed, there are loopholes, as well as individual and institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existenceof loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent examples. Loopholes are also found in govern-ment resort to "black" intelligence and weapons programs, in the use of contractors, and in the absence ofclear definitions of such terms as "national security" and "national security risk." Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S. Intelligence activities do not extend to non-intelligence government agencies or to their contractors. If fact, Executive Order 12333 specifies that gov-ernment contractors do not need to know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives. In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management addressesthe problem of tracking funds granted to government-contracted research and development (R&D) centers.
The report notes that the problem is compounded by DoD's penchant for creating hard-to-monitor "shell"contractors as disbursement centers for funding programs. Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly accountable to Congress. Being beyondCongressional oversight, they have the license to operate as Government surrogates in intelligence opera-tions about which, "officially" they know nothing. In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier As A System" symposium noted that theArmy's Research and Technology Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers, employing approxi-mately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a small part of overallDoD research spending. Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of "non-lethal" weapons, is not governedby laws restricting the activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be presumed that these agen-cies contribute to and benefit from such research. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and experimentation reported to us. 2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing experiments with effects which directed- 3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation is extensive 4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in mind-control experimentation; and various agencies of the Government have a record of circumventing legal restrictions upon their activities. 5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look closely into "black" intelligence and weapons 6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest in testing directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens under non-clinical/non-controlled circumstances – DoD, to test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality"; DoE, to explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test "mind-control" capabilities, and NSA, for techno-logical refinement. Overt and Covert Harassment
Since publication of the preceding article less than four months ago, the Association of National Security Alumni/Electronic Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13 individuals who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which coincide with the known effects of exposure tomicrowaves, electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound. The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater detail in future Project reports. Suffice it tosay, at this point, that the physical and psychological symptoms being reported to us are consistent with theeffects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed, the numerous afflictions (or"inflictions") being reported appear to parallel standard torture "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects). OVERT HARASSMENT
Overt Harassment – which obviously is meant to be observed – may be intended to "precondition" individ-uals for eventual long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt harassment arenot likely to cope with the sudden onset of electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. Thisphased pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being investigated. The fact that the overtharassment continues in these cases even after the electronic targeting commences suggest that the objec-tive is to maintain long-term extremes of stress. Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing in cases which (so far) have notinvolved discernible forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving so-called "whistleblowers"who, because of their inside knowledge of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats ofembarrassment to the Government or to government-affiliated employers. We have noticed that electronicharassment is beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist electronic"harassees." Retaliation suggest loss of control. Under these circumstances, we are not entirely confidentthat "whistleblowers" will continue to be exempted from this type of harassment in the long term. The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their circumstances as involving most, if not all, ofthe following overt forms of harassment: • Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of harassment and vandalism by formerly friendly • Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the targeted individual obtains new, unlisted tele- • Mail interception, theft and tampering. • Noise campaigns. While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered in this context, other tactics are employed.
Blaring horns, whistles, sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently in apartment settings, for excessivelyprolonged periods of time), and amplified transmissions of recorded "general racket" have been used on arecurrent basis under circumstances intended to persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance. In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent tothese sudden, continuous explosions of noise. Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in apartment buildings. One individual reported that,during a peak period of harassment, the neighbor across the hall began entering and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door loudly on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence, encompassingperiods of several hours, over a period of several months. It is apparently served to trigger a door-slam-ming "chain reaction" on the part of neighbors both on that floor and on the floors immediately above andbelow. When our contact politely asked her immediate neighbor to close her door more quietly, heslammed the door in her face. Prior to commencement of this harassment, the neighbor had apparentlybeen quite friendly and courteous. In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoDcontractor engaged in the "super-secret" research and development of some type of electronic equipment. Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in their ventilation systems during the prelimi-nary stages of their harassment. One individual complained of being recurrently awakened in the middle ofthe night by the sound of wires being fed into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking further, hefound that a tubular construction had been built into his vent system which appears to lead to the apartmentupstairs. His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice. A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and downstairs apartments appear to follow themfrom room to room, tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear intended to advertisean ongoing surveillance. The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to offer an unsolicited apology to herdownstairs neighbor for an all-night "pacing about" in her bedroom (in the event he had happened to noticeit). She claimed to be an insomniac. The pacing-about continued during her recent 36-hour absence fromthe area. When her contact politely alerted her to the fact that her apartment had apparently been enteredduring her absence, she told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then immediately complained tothe building manager that he was stalking her.
She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she had assiduously "courted" this individualfor several months, without success; and that she had been stealing his newspapers on a regular basis. (Onone occasion, she handed him a week's accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had been left out-side the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting and saving the newspapers which had notbeen delivered to her directly is unknown.) • Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers; and comments by strangers which appear intended to evoke "paranoid" reactions. In this context, we note that several individuals have reported confrontations with "homeless" people who,on closer examination, were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat fashion (wigs includ-ed). The same "eccentric" confronted two of the individuals in contact with us, at separate distant locations.
He is reported as having feigned mental illness on both occasions, and as having apparently enjoyed creat-ing a public scene. • Entries into the individual's residence, during late-night hours while he/she is sleeping, and/or during the In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their visits, such as relocating objects, or by com-mitting petty and not-so-petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's "calling card" was to slaughtercaged pets, leaving the mangled carcasses inside their locked cages. In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence and left a packet of crack cocaine behind asa "calling card." Our contact in this case – an individual who has no criminal record and no history ofexperimentation with drugs – is also being harassed (stalked) by a police officer of her community. One ofhis recent acts was to "frame" her with a drug possession charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent pastime) and subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he conveniently managed to find aglassine packet of cocaine eight feet away, in front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fin-gers and then charged her with Possession. Our contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her apartmentshortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling her case that the police officer had smudgedhis only piece of evidence with his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone is interested in correct-ing that police officer's oversight. In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of money has been stolen from a hidingplace in her apartment, within hours after she had withdrawn the money from her bank. There was no obvi-ous signs of entry into her apartment. The police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce evi-dence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is usually not stolen.
Documents appear to be the preferred objects of theft, when theft occur.) In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with "exploding" bulbs, many of which were'Made in Hungary.' The lightbulbs are now in our possession. • Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive nature. In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding accompanied the sudden onset of sever gastroin-testinal disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the deteriorative process simply bychanging the locks on her door.
This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment. Sleep deprivation, as a tactic, invariably sur-faces when the targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong emotional and irrational response to the otherforms of harassment. • Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment campaigns – slashed tires, smashed win-dows, oil drainage, oil contamination, destruction of electronic components and batteries (frequentlyinvolving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages, often within range of weapons research facilities and/orother microwave emitters); and suddenly failed brakes and clutches (possible involving anti-traction poly-mers, which are also in DoD's "non-lethal" weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have also been report-ed. Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated immediately after having the oil changed by rep-utable mechanics. In one of these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened) while the individual was drivingthrough a remote rural area. Her car ground to a halt. Getting the "gunk" cleaned out of her engine provedto be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council asserving "non-lethal" strategic purposes – a topic discussed in Part I of this publication. Had this womanbeen assaulted while awaiting help in the said isolated area, the "non-lethal" attributes of viscosificationagents might have required redefinition.) Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring basis have abandoned driving all together– an objective apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of increasing their isolation. The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types of experiences. One individual, for exam-ple, was tailgated at a high rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being threatened with a gunby one of the vehicles' occupants. Two others narrowly avoided what happened to be deliberately attempt- ed collisions by drivers who quickly sped away from the scene. One avoided three attempts in four days atbeing run off the road. One survived by being run off the road in two incidents within a one-week period,which resulted in "totaling" of her two vehicles. Another narrowly avoided being crushed into an express-way retaining wall, on four occasions, by an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same time frame,being "fried" by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which subsequently repaired them-selves. It should be noted that, in some of these cases, "accidental" deaths do occur. One individual in con-tact with us reported that his mother drove off a cliff to her death, during a period when he was researchingevidence that a still-respected, high level State Department official had passed A-bomb secrets to theSoviet Government during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car had undergone routinemaintenance. She was returning from a dental appointment when the accident occurred. Witnesses statethat it appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the accelerator before running off the road. The accidentserved to terminate this person's research project. We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who was killed when the brakes on hertractor failed. We are informed that she had been collecting affidavits from persons who believe they arethe targets of government harassment and experimentation when her "accident" occurred. We are alsoinformed that these affidavits have disappeared. Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents," particularly where "plausibly deniable" governmentinvolvement has been surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a man in Trappe, PA,who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA to intervene in his case. We have copies of that earlycorrespondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar technician, had a highly technical and – given date ofhis correspondence – "precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently being sought in hiscase. It is apparent from his correspondence that he had wanted to believe that the Soviets were conductingthese experiments. The FBI and CIA, of course, did not intervene. We are informed that members of hisfamily have also been targets of this experimentation. • Isolation of the individual from members of his/her family – virtually assured when highly focused forms The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children in the family become targets for apparentpurposes of intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our cases, to date. One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic harassment focusing on her children)killed one child in an effort to protect her from further pain.(2) It appears that lasers were being used in thisindividual's case. The targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to report the harassment,which she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored. It became even more deadly when, in a further showof defiance, she then called the representative of the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S. Government'swar in the Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now hospitalized in a midwestern facility, where, apparent-ly, the experimentation is now continuing. (That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate number of complaints of electronic harass-ment are beginning to surface. It is also within range of a U.S. Air Force base which houses a "supersecret" research facility. We are currently looking into information that spouses and children of personsemployed on that USAF base may be the targets of involuntary experimentation involving direct-energyweapons technologies.) Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an employee of a local power companythat, if she valued the lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition to the company's installa-tion of high power lines. Since receiving that threat, the individual's 11-year-old daughter has been reducedto extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which cannot bediagnosed. It is also apparent to this individual that her three-year-old son is on the receiving end of exter-nally-induced auditory input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.) • Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by termination of the individual's employment, and compounded by expenses associated with the harassment. The majority of those now in contact with the Project – educated, white-collar professionals – have losttheir jobs. Termination of employment in many of these cases involved prefatory harassment by theemployer and co-workers, which coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed above. The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent, non-sequential and overlapping. As notedabove, the overt harassment continues even after the electronic harassment commences. FAILURE OF "ESTABLISHMENT" SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Those individuals who have tried to resolve their respective situations through resort to "establishment"channels have invariably encountered the following: • Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the part of members of Congress and state legisla- • Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists who refuse to include the terms, "government harassment," "mind-control experimentation" and "torture" in their vocabulary.
Several individuals, thinking the psychiatrists might help to alleviate the extreme stress associated withtheir harassment, and accorded "treatment" which clearly pointed to co-operation between their psychia-trists and members of the U.S. Intelligence community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged about beinga member of the U.S. Intelligence "inner circle," informing our contact that her harassment was a"Pavlovian Experiment," intended to "break" her.
• Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal circles. Few of those in contact with us have been able to acquire legal assistance – not helped by their straitenedfinancial circumstances. Most have found that few attorneys are willing to risk their careers by pursuingcases involving what is believed to be government-sponsored harassment or experimentation. A few attorneys reportedly engaged in egregious violations of codes of professional conduct, in whatappear to have been deliberate efforts at sabotaging our contacts' cases. Subsequent attempts by two indi-viduals at obtaining legal redress were met with stonewalling, obstruction, and high-level denials of wrong-doing. • Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except in those cases where suspected experimentees have been driven to committing murder or suicide. Such cases (particularly where an individual has claimed to be a victim of CIA-directed mind-controlinvolving auditory input) are treated by the press as "curiosities." An example of this is the individual whoshot a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in mid-1991.(3) He claimed to be a victim of CIA mind control,involving auditory input. According to the press, "he worried 'about being run over by trains'." (ref. inci-dent described in following paragraph). He is now permanently residing in a psychiatric facility. He, beinginstitutionalized, and others in the preliminary stages of his predicament are no longer of interest to themedia. Another recent case which received short-lived press attention(4) involved a woman diagnosed as having"suffered from periods of confusion" who climbed over a fence onto a railroad track and walked into anoncoming train. Because the incident occurred in a community in which an unusually large number ofmind-control experiments have been reported, we are looking into the situation. The woman was reportedly "under a physician's care" because of her "periods of confusion." A family member described the physicianto this investigator as "a psychiatrist." We find that the alleged "psychiatrist" is a General Practitioner, oth-erwise non-accredited, practicing out of his home. We find also that the suicide may have been witnessedunder peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged "homeless" person who has since disappeared.
Needless to say, our interest has been whetted. • Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene. The tendency of local police is to dismiss an individual's complaints of government harassment as the rav-ings of a "fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooper-ating in the harassment. Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the situation, hesitate tointervene in cases involving what they believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain policeofficials did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived to be evidence of a systematicharassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absence of a clear mandate to prosecute "stalkers" acting underthe aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the police obviously had their hands tied. • Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our attention thus far.
FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from"mentally disturbed persons" who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves" and/or "are hearingvoices." "from Mars, that is." In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in a angry, defensive and bizarre fashion when our contact brieflyalluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT SLAMMER isa CIA-funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral scientist, which explores the "mental make-up"of alleged security risks, along with their family members and close associates. Participants in PROJECTSLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.) Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach in this case was to politelyand redundantly explain that the law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in this indi-vidual's case. What she briefly pointed out that the surveillance activities might fall under the purview ofPROJECT SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to abruptly and angrily declaim, "You don't knowwho is conducting that surveillance! You don't know if that is a state police surveillance!.or a local policesurveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation! You don't know who is conducting that surveillance![etc., etc.]!" It was apparent from that response that the FBI was at least acknowledging the existence of a surveillance,if in somewhat emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently furnished acquired evidence tothe local police, who made it clear that they are no participants in the surveillance which, based on the evi-dence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the target. • Refusal of/inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene. Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from persons claiming to be the targets ofsome type of electronic harassment. An ACLU spokes-woman characterized the complaints as appearing tobe rational, except in a few cases. The complaints are not being investigated, she said, because of "limitedresources." We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rightsof prostitutes and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases such as we are now pur-suing. Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that they could not intervene in her casebecause their focus is on the U.S. Government's treatment of prison inmates. While incarceration doesappear to be one sought-for objective in this harassment/mind control experiments, we would like to thinkthat protection by such organizations as Amnesty International can be achieved beforehand. RELATED COVERT METHODOLOGIES
The persons engaged in this harassment tend to become careless, possibly the result of arrogance born ofan assumption that nobody can stop them. "Harassees" who have noted this carelessness have furnished uswith the following insights into the covert side of these harassment activities. One individual found that her next-door neighbor had claimed to be a military intelligence officer, assignedto a space technology unit in California, on year-long "TDY" (temporary duty) in the individual's apart-ment building. It is subsequently determined that this alleged officer is not in fact a member of the U.S.
Armed Forces; and that he had used this bogus status to acquire information from a major defense contrac-tor. Our contact is certain that this person's apartment was used as a base of harassment operations. • Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date. Several individuals and supportive associates report having seen some of the electronic devices being usedin these harassment campaigns. One saw electronic equipment concealed inside a false-front upright piano being moved out of her apart-ment building. She had previously noted that all of her surrounding neighbors had identical upright pianosin their apartments, not one of which was ever played. Other suspected participants in the harassment may be concealing devices in oversized stereo speakers,measuring approximately 5' in height x 3'x3'. Several of our contacts have noted the presence of suchspeakers in adjacent dwellings. One individual was told by a resident of her building that her upstairs neighbor has "microwave ovens" inhis bedroom and livingroom, but none in the kitchen. Another individual, while standing outside, looked in her neighbor's window to find that her bedroomappeared to be the target of a gray-colored, elongated box-like device, measuring approximately 1' inlength x 5" in height (side view). A large, black-framed lens protruded from the end facing her window.
The electrical cord, if any, was not visible from that vantage point. The equipment was being operated by astranger in a three-piece suit, who appeared to be quite startled to find that he was being observed. Another was given strong reason to believe that portable emitters are being concealed in oversized,extremely heavy, sometimes expandable "briefcases" for use in places of public assembly, such as meetinghalls, auditoriums and restaurants. Smaller varieties are apparently being used on aircraft. On a 3-hour flight, our contact noticed that the man sitting next to her seemed peculiarly intent on keepingthe attache case on his lap propped open with his fingertips, while he gazed "blankly" into the distance dur-ing the entire flight. She believed that she was being electronically harassed while on a flight (a commoncomplaint, in most of these cases now being investigated). Our contact reports that, when they prepared to land, the man opened his attache case to hastily check hiscontents, thus disclosing the presence of a raised, built-in "concealment device" covering the entire bottomsurface of the attache case. The low-slung, lift-off cover did not appear to be capable of concealing a lap-top computer. At one point during the flight – apparently aware that his "reverie" was inviting attention, –the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted entries on a sheet of lined paper, whichhe had placed on top of the briefcase two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten minutes to the effort(obviously preferring a pen to a laptop computer). His attache case remained ajar during this process.(5) One individual reports that mobile emitters may be installed in certain oversized, non-attributed medicalemergency vehicles, possibly for the eventual use in civil disturbances. Her unsuccessful attempts at fol-lowing the "medical emergency" vehicle which had surfaced in her case ended with a high-speed chase. The phony military intelligence officer, when recently moving out of our contact's apartment building, wasfound to possess a device which resembles an oversized microwave oven, measuring approximately 4' inwidth x 2' in height x 2 1/2' in depth. A subsequent examination of his apartment revealed that he hadtapped numerous additional lines into existing, in-house telephone and TV cables; and that he had gone togreat pains to conceal a major excavation into one wall abutting the "harassee's." Judging from photo-graphs taken immediately after this person's departure, the wiring suggests that he was hooked by modeminto a computer network, and at least of some of his electronic equipment was situated in a large walk-incloset, again abutting the "harassee's." When the alleged officer moved out, his equipment (except for the oversized "microwave oven") was pack-aged in boxes identifying the contents only as stereo components. During his year-long residency in thisbuilding, no sounds emanated from his apartment to indicate use of this "stereo" equipment. • Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes. Some individuals have noted that their neighbors' vehicles are periodically replaced (during peak periods ofharassment) by others which qualify as "rough look-alikes." The tags on the latter closely resemble thoseon the homeowners' vehicles, with a difference being noted in only one digit or one letter. These modifiedplates appear to have been acquired through State DMV channels, thus suggesting government/intelligenceagency involvement. In one case, where the individual has obtained police assistance, tracking of one plate surfaced evidence ofa drug connection. The plate rapidly disappeared from the vehicle in question, to be replaced by another,again bearing a one-letter modification. • Use of neighbors' residences as bases of operation and training. One individual recently saw a team of "technicians" in the house behind hers – a consequence of the team'sfailure to close the curtains and/or dim the lights when puttering around the kitchen at 5:00 in the morning.
The three men (strangers to this individual, all stripped down to their T-shirts) behaved as if they wereunaware that they were being watched. Their observer had long suspected that this house was being usedas a base of electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been going on throughout the night. To provoke a response from these men, the individual eventually commented aloud on their activities. Theyresponded immediately by turning the lights off and switching to the use of flashlights. Why they failed toclose the curtain is unknown. This individual is working with the police in a effort at ending this surveillance and harassment, withmixed results.
Another individual, paying a surprise visit to the apartment upstairs, overheard one of her own telephoneconversations being played on a tape recorder inside that apartment. Lacking both a legitimate pretext toenter the apartment and the support of the building's management personnel and/or the police, she was pre-vented from pursuing this further. Her upstairs neighbor is purportedly employed by Stanford UniversityHospital, in Stanford, CA. The target of surveillance and harassment in this case is still also trying to recover from the effects ofexposure to potentially lethal doses of radiation, administered in the 1970's by a dangerously "incompetent"dentist. This might explain the involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital personnel in her situation.
The government is on record as having experimented on unwitting U.S. citizens with radioactive materialsduring the 1970's (and earlier).(6) The House Subcommittee on Energy and Commerce based their investi-gation into this matter on a 30-year accumulation of documents maintained by the Department of Energy.
Under the circumstances, it will come as no surprise if it is ultimately found that DoE has been involved inthis woman's surveillance and harassment. Another individual paid a surprise visit to the apartment immediately below hers, in the attempt to identifythe source of tremendous racket in her ventilation system. Standing outside the door, she could hear anindividual moving around, a short distance from the door. She also heard the sound of rustling paper andthe steady, sonar-like "pinging" of some type of electronic device. In response to her repeated knockings onthe door, the person inside simply stopped moving about. The sound of rustling paper (perhaps a printoutof some type) and the steady ".pin-ng!.pin-ng!" sound continued. The occupant of this apartmentresumed moving about only after it was (incorrectly) believed that our contact had departed the area.
Typically, this situation could not be pursued further.
All of those who live in apartment buildings report unusual patterns of occupancy in the apartments sur-rounding their own; i.e., upstairs, downstairs and on all sides. They have become quite convinced – if onlybecause of the highly focused nature of the systems being experienced – that these surrounding apartmentsare being used as bases of operation. Perhaps this encirclement facilities studies of holographic humantelemetries; or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain entrainment by electronic means("entrainment" being one published objective sought in mind control experiments).(7) In examining this situation more closely, a number of individuals have found that surrounding apartmentsare either permanently vacant, for unknown reasons, or that they have been "sub-let" by the original occu-pants to persons who are purportedly unknown to the buildings' management personnel. In one case, thesurrounding renters all list two residences in the local telephone book. No one lives in the apartment build-ing in question, though the address is identified as one of the renters' places of residence. One individualsuspects that the original occupants of apartments surrounding hers have been simply relocated to otherapartments in the same (large) building. Another suspects that an adjacent apartment, which has been per-manently rented to the U.S. Government for use by "visitors" is also being used as a base of operations. One individual found that an immediate neighbor's housemate has the same (unusual) name of a universityprofessor who has engaged in extensive research on behalf of the government, studying the bioeffects ofexposure to microwave radiation. • Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members of the opposite sex. As noted in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Interior and Insular Affair's draft report,Alyeska Pipeline Service Company Covert Operation (July 1992), the Wackenhut Corporation's SpecialInvestigations Division adopted this tactic when pursuing Alyeska's critics. A number of individuals in touch with us report a range of experiences with new "friends" who – apparent-ly posing as confidants – used acquired personalia to abruptly end these "friendships" under deliberatelydegrading and humiliating circumstances. When taken in the context of ongoing surveillance and harass-ment, these exercises appear intended to heighten emotional trauma, perhaps to provoke an uncontrolledresponse and/or to enforce isolation. • Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former case officers). One individual while under contract to the U.S. Government, properly reported what he believed to be anapproach by a hostile intelligence service. Within a few weeks, alleged U.S. Intelligence officers contactedthis individual. In addition to questioning him about his background, these alleged intelligence officersasked that he keep in constant contact with them, particularly when planning to travel. It soon became apparent that the alleged intelligence officers were intent only on forcing this individual toreport to them as directed, and to account for his activities. He was not asked to assist the U.S. Governmentin any form of intelligence operation; he was not asked to execute any form of secrecy affirmation state-ment acknowledging the classified nature of these meetings; nor was he told why these meetings – involv-ing a total of seven alleged case officers – were necessary.
When he began to balk at a continuation of this process, one of his "handlers" conveyed a threat, suggest-ing that his continued compliance might be "enforced." Finally, when this individual adamantly refused tocorporate further, massive overt harassment commenced and is currently ongoing. The operation (clearly intended to bully this individual into submissive compliance for purposes which arestill unknown) involved crude tactics formerly prized by the KGB. Whether or not legitimate U.S. Intelligence case officers were involved in this activity remains to be deter-mined. Some private firms retain former U.S. Intelligence case officers for contracting out as "security spe-cialist." The founder and CEO of one such firm (Gerald P. Burke, The Parvus Company, Silver Spring,MD) has informed us that the activities of contract case officers are neither monitored nor subjected to for-mal restraint. • Use of psychotropic drugs by cooperative physicians. Shortly after resigning from the CIA, one of our contacts underwent a range of experiences which suggest-ed that she had been massively drugged. One of the alleged perpetrators, whom we have met, alternatelyclaims to be employed by NASA and/or by a firm in Miami, handling, "microwave equipment." NASA hasno record of this person under the name furnished. The "experimentee" ultimately sought the assistance of a psychiatrist, whom her parents had located as areferral. The psychiatrist treated her reported "flashbacks" by immediately placing her on a regimen ofStelazine, which quickly aggravated her condition. He also made comments to this individual which sug-gested that he had a foreknowledge of her situation, and that he was cooperating with U.S. Intelligence. Onone occasion the psychiatrist intimated that our contact might be employable as an assassin; and he repeat-edly urged her to move to Great Britain where, he said, she would be put in touch with an unidentifiedMember of Parliament. Interestingly, he had a tremendous computer system in his office suite, which he explained as being con-nected by modem into a national level system which, in turn, connected to private residences. When show-ing her this equipment, the psychiatrist informed our contact that she had been "CAT scanned," pointingout that she was the subject of a vast series of "A's" and "B's" being printed out by one of the many termi-nals at his disposal. Our contact also found out that this psychiatrist kept a military uniform in his closet which bore the rankand insignia of a three-star general. The individual ultimately sought psychiatric support elsewhere. Her new psychiatrist, formerly employedby DoD, immediately put her on a regimen of Haladol Decanoate, Klonopin and Benzatropine. The com-bined effect of these drugs was loss of memory and a state of mind which, under other circumstances,might be diagnosed as Depersonalization or Dissociative Disorder. All three drugs proved to be highlyaddictive. Our contact, since severing contact which this psychiatrist as well, has finally successfully over-come the addiction.
Another individual – the one whose psychiatrist had informed her of her role in a "Pavlovian Experiment"– was subjected to attempted drugging by Trazodone, one of the strongest sedatives on the market. Thepsychiatrist in question kept no record of the individual's outpatient visits, nor of her Trazodone prescrip- tions. Being unaware that the individual was not adhering to his regimen, the psychiatrist urged her rapidlyto increase her dosage, renewing her 30-day prescription after a period of only 11 days. Though aware of her heart condition, he failed to monitor her condition, dismissing her complaints of(electronically-induced) pains in her heart as inconsequential. Trazodone is known to aggravate heart con-ditions. Perhaps the intent was to have this individual succumb to a "heart attack" as the result of "imag-ined" government harassment. Neither the appropriate psychiatric society nor the FBI would touch thiscase.
Another individual (a clear target of retaliation) sought medical assistance to counter sudden massiveheadaches and recurrent attacks of vomiting – effects which can be produced by infrasound. The physicianto whom she was referred (an alleged specialist in Internal Medicine) placed her on a combination ofCompazine and Xanax, prescribing dosages which the Physicians' Desk Reference warns against. Compazine, in addition to being an anti-emetic, is used in the treatment of psychotic disorders. It can alsocause dyskinesia, an irreversible syndrome involving loss of motor control. Xanax is known to inducevomiting. Both drugs can lead to dependance and a worsening of the patient's condition. The effects of allsuch drugs, in fact, can be mutated in high-energy fields, thus increasing the likelihood of adverse reac-tions. We have recently found that this prescribing "physician" is not licensed to practice medicine in the State ofwhich she has been practicing since at least 1989. Our contact, being concerned about the long-term effects of Xanax and Compazine, consulted anotherphysician in the same office. The physician immediately prescribed Prozac, failing to concurrently recom-mend that her patient discontinue the Xanax and Compazine prescriptions. When our contact refused totake any psychotropic drugs, the doctor became upset and asked, "Don't you want to get well?" This second physician is a licensed practitioner in Internal Medicine, with no background in Psychiatry. Wealso found that she apparently refers her patients to yet a third physician in the office who claims to be apsychiatrist. She, too, is licensed to practice Internal Medicine, only. Her receptionist described this thirdphysician as having a psychiatric "sub-specialty," . "as an internist." The receptionist also informed us thatthis internist "is treating a number of psychiatric patients." On pursuing this further, we find that these physicians are in a small "medicine group" which is not listedby specialty in standard regional telephone directories. The group bears the same name as one of the CIA'smost infamous recruited physicians (perhaps best described as "the Mengele of MKULTRA"). The doctor's offices are located in a bank building, which, we have found, is a favored hiding place forsecurity-oriented business and government agencies. Two computer firms, co-located with an attorney whorepresents "Island Resort Development, Ltd.," are situated immediately beneath the doctors' offices. Theprospect of finding island resort developments within 500 miles of this attorney's office is limited. Our contact, being apprised of these findings, is seeking medical help elsewhere.
In two of our cases, urologists took it upon themselves to play the role of "psychiatrist"; i.e., they renderedpsychiatric diagnoses and prescribed psychotropic drugs. One of these urologist, employed by The MayoClinic in Rochester, MN, prescribed Haldol, informing our contact that he perceived her to be "psychotic."His efforts at getting a Clinic psychiatrist to confirm this diagnosis were unsuccessful. The psychiatrist,apparently a rare individual who subscribes to codes of medical ethics, found nothing wrong with thiswoman, even given the nature of her complaints. The urologist's response to this was to issue his ownHaldol prescription. Sensing that something was amiss, the woman refused to have the prescription filled.
Yet another individual ended up in the hands of a psychiatrist who, as a purported means of ending thestress associated with her harassment, offered to put her under hypnosis. She described the hypnotic stateas "equivalent to floating" and (based on her overall experiences with this physician) has not ruled out thepossibility that drugs may have been surreptitiously administered. The psychiatrist claimed to be interestedin psychic phenomena and demonstrated an apparently remarkable ability to read the individual's mind. While in her hypnotic state, the individual felt a sharp, painful pressure inside her nose, as if somethingwere being shoved up her nostrils to the sinus cavities. She awoke to find blood pouring from her nostrils.
The psychiatrist casually dismissed this as owing to a probable cold. Shortly after the experience, the individual began to hear loud tones in her head, followed in due course byauditory input. Brain scans have failed to yield evidence of an implant device. (We have recommended thatshe undergo a scan by means of a suitably adapted non-linear junction detector, as a preliminary.) Sufficeto say, this individual has severed contact with the psychiatrist and is continuing to cope with the ongoingovert electronic harassment by other non-medical means. The situation just described is not our first encounter with the apparent use of medical implant devices inthese harassment/mind-control cases. Another of our contacts began receiving auditory input roughly 15years after she had 4 mm. cochlear implants placed in her ears. The "voices" claimed to be affiliated withthe CIA and, among other things, expressed intentions of running this woman as an agent in denied areasby "piggybacking" their audio transmissions onto standard FM frequencies to avoid detection. We have been unable to locate the surgeon who implanted these devices, though we do have a copy of hisoperative reports. A recent CAT scan of this individual failed to disclose the presence of the cochlearimplants. Several years ago, the individual (now a psychologist) applied for a position with the CIA. She was inter-viewed by four Langley-based, purported psychologists, who allegedly informed her that her job wouldinvolve the assessments of certain criminals for purposes of weighing their purposes for loyalty to thisagency.
During these interviews, she was told to read several books by such persons as Philip Agee, StansfieldTurner and Ralph McGehee, all of whom were unknown to her. The alleged psychologist claimed thatthese authors had described the CIA "as it really is." Our contact was not asked to execute a security affir-mation statement acknowledging the classified nature of these proceedings. The unconventional manner of this interview process suggested that this individual was being toyed with,for reason which remain to be determined. She did not get the job and in fact more recently lost her jobwith a state penitentiary. She was fired on the recommendation of the prison's psychiatrist, because of herinsistence that she is receiving auditory input from the CIA personnel who persist in feeding her classifiedinformation. Interestingly, though this individual was deemed unfit to function as a psychologist in the penitentiary sys-tem, the State rehired her, assigning her to a mental health facility where, apparently, she is to develop abehavioral modification program for retarded adults with a diagnosed mental illness. This individual claimed to be receiving and responding to externally-induced auditory "advice" whileworking with prison inmates. It may be presumed that the process will continue. Under the circumstances,we have to wonder if this case qualifies as a benchmark in mind-control experimentation; i.e., employmentof a mind-controlled psychologist to run the equivalent of mind-control experiments on mentally-ill retard-ed adults. We will continue to monitor this situation.
The individual we previously identified as having challenged a local power company also appears to havebeen "tagged" by some type of implant device. During a recent symposium, she was approached by a manwhose business card identifies him as "Program Manager, Electromagnetic Radiation Division," DoE. Hisapproach was suitably sympathetic. Our contact ultimately accepted this man's invitation to continue dis-cussing their common ranges of interest in his hotel room. During this meeting, she accepted the offer of adrink, blacked out after consuming it, and woke up four hours later, still in this man's hotel room, to findthat the back of her ear had been punctured and was bleeding. There was no evidence of sexual assault.
The man glibly evaded this woman's request for an explanation. She has since found two adjacent puncturemarks behind her ear, which are not healing properly, and between which she can feel the presence of a"wire" measuring approximately 1/3" in length. We are pursuing this further.
The said DoE Project Manager has more recently initiated contact with yet another activist in touch withthis Association. His call was unsolicited. He apparently wanted to know to know if this woman would beattending an upcoming conference. We have warned the individual to avoid any form of private meetingwith the said Project Manager.
To date, we are aware of three cases involving clandestine behavior on the part of alleged DoE employees.
The CIA figures prominently (if peculiarly) in the majority of the other cases. Two of those have been dis-cussed above. In another case, also involving auditory input, the individual is certain that the current Director of CentralIntelligence (DCI) participated in the "voice transmission" process on at least one occasion. She claims tohave recognized his voice. When she commented aloud on the DCI's perceived involvement in this experi-mentation, the "voice" responded with stuttered and stammered denials. We are told that this particular"voice" has not been heard from since.
In yet another case involving auditory input, the individual has allegedly been informed by her "voices"that the technologies being used against her were stolen from the CIA by a maverick employee, whosegroup is now targeting her from a distance of 2,000 miles. She reported this to the DCI's office and wasallegedly informed by the Deputy DCI that she will be awarded millions of dollars if she can produce theequipment and any of the personnel involved in her harassment. One unusually-candid CIA spokesman also allegedly informed this individual that, "while the CIA does notdeny having this equipment," they "do not use it in this country." Perhaps this explains why a number ofour contacts have also been electronically harassed while traveling overseas. This woman has also been repeatedly assured by CIA DDS (security) personnel of the Agency's sincereconcern for her welfare. During a recent telephone conversation with that office, we confirmed that she isindeed known to the CIA. Based on this, we asked that the Agency "put its money where its mouth is," soto speak, by conducting a long-term electronic sweep of this individual's premises. That was two monthsago. No sweep has been conducted, though CIA spokesmen continue to "sympathize" with her predica-ment.
Another individual, a target of harassment and experimentation since 1952 (apparently singled out becauseof his student activism while at Penn State University) began hearing "voices" after having most of histeeth capped. He has been more recently been informed by his "handlers" that implanted devices are nolonger used for purposes of inducing auditory input. No explanation was offered. He was quite visibly sur-prised when informed by this investigator that auditory input can be achieved solely by means of pulsedmicrowave audiograms (discussed in Part I of this report). The individual's "handlers" allegedly have also stated that their experiments on U.S. citizens are in pursuitof a variety of objectives; viz., (1) develop an effective means for creating a perfect, "robotized" soldier; (2) alter individual sexual performances, such as by turning heterosexuals into homosexuals (they allegedly claim to be having "difficulties" reversing the process); (3) enhance and destroy levels of academic achievement, at will, such as by degrading the performance of otherwise brilliant students, and by drastically improving the performance of poor students. Given the technology at the government's disposal and a predisposition of the part of certain governmentalagencies to "play God" in experimental fashion with citizens' lives, these purported projects do not comeacross as being totally far-fetched.
Another case involves a woman whose experiences suggest that she, too, is an MKULTRA experimenteebeing kept on the books, so to speak. The woman, apparently a "pet" experimentee, found herself beingintroduced to a wide array of prominent individuals whose connections with the CIA she believed to bequite apparent. One of those she states, was Robert Jay Lifton, a well-known author and expert on brain-washing, whose books include "The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide"(Basic Books, 1986). Her experiences included a voluntary ("referral") admission to Hollywood Hospital, Vancouver, BritishColumbia, Canada, in 1973, during an era when MKULTRA experiments at the Alan Memorial Institute,McGill University, Montreal, Canada, were only beginning to capture the attention of the U.S. Senate.(8) More recently, in 1990, she was transported to New York University's Cameron Medical Center, inWestchester, NY (under circumstance which qualify as an abduction), where she was forcibly wrestled tothe ground by approximately six center staffers and forcibly confined for a period of approximately threeweeks. She was neither psychiatrically counseled nor formally tested while in that facility. The psychia-trists assigned to her case appeared more intent on forcing her to take a combination of neuroleptic drugs,to include Haldol, Navane, and Cogentin. (Haldol and Navane can cause tardive dyskinesia.) She resistedthose attempts. A court ultimately ordered this woman released from the center, stipulating that she was not to be adminis-tered drugs. On subsequently acquiring her medical records, under conditions which prevented censoringor doctoring those records, she found that her psychiatrists had planned to inject her with drugs (in defi-ance of the court order) on the day of her release. As luck would have it, she was released a day early.
The woman states that she has met Budd Hopkins, of the Intruders Foundation, and that she had a long-term, confiding relationship with John E. Mack, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and thefounding Director of the Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age (previously named, ResearchProgram for the Study of Human Continuity; and, still previously, rumored to have cooperated with theCIA in studies of "human ecology"). At one point in their relationship, Professor Mack apparently accompanied this woman to a "supportgroup" meeting of UFO abductees, who, she observed bemusedly, "spent their time comparing [extraterres-trially] implanted devices." Professor Mack is on record as promoting the perception that UFO abductionsare legitimate.(9) We frankly doubt that extraterrestrials who have a means to commute intergalactically would stoop toimplanting comparatively primitive devices in human beings. However, should it be proved that the psychi-atrist, surgeon and DoE Project Manager above are extraterrestrials posing as humans, we will be happy toweigh that information. If it is similarly established to the vehicular "abduction" of the woman discussed above was the work of an extraterrestrial named Kaplan, who was posing as a human with Cornell MedicalCenter connections, we will be happy to ponder that as well. In the meantime, it would seem reasonable that the government would want the public to believe thatextraterrestrial visitations are on the upswing. Mind-altering drugs, externally-induced auditory input, holo-graphic projections (also a DoD capability),(10) appropriately focused directed-energy targeting, deviceimplantations, special effects and abductions are all within this government's capabilities and can be usedfor purposes of creating illusions of UFO experiences. Persons not cognizant of this might be moreinclined to fall for the UFO mythologies now being officially "legitimized." Other cases, possibly involving U.S. Navy Intelligence, NSA, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and,peripherally, members of the former Soviet Bloc intelligence services will be discussed in further reports. HARASSMENT OBJECTIVES
In his book, Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, Dr. Harvey Weinstein quotes the followingpassage from a book entitled, A battle for the Mind: A Physiology in Conversion and Brainwashing, byWilliam Sergeant (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1957): "By increasing the prolonged stress in various ways, or inducing physical debilitation, a more thoroughalteration of the person's thinking process may be achieved. .If the stress or physical debilitation, or both,are carried one stage further, it may happen that patterns of thought and behavior, especially those of recentacquisition, become disrupted. New patterns can then be substituted, or suppressed patterns allowed toreassert themselves; or the subject might begin to think or act in ways precisely contradicting his formerones. "'.If a complete sudden collapse can be produced by prolonging or intensifying emotional stress, the corti-cal slate may be wiped clean temporarily of its more recently implanted patterns of behavior, perhapsallowing others to be substituted more easily.'" Dr. Weinstein then comments: "The parallel with [Dr. Ewen] Cameron's theory of differential amnesia isstriking, and the relationship to brainwashing is abundantly clear."(11) Dr. Cameron, employed by McGillUniversity's Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, between 1943 and 1964, conductedbrainwashing experiments upon select, non-volunteer psychiatric patients on behalf of the CIA. Dr.
Weinstein's father was one of Cameron's victims. Sergeant's theorems and Cameron's associated experimental findings appear to be the driving force behindthe harassment and experimentation now being reported to this Association. All of these individuals arebeing subjected to a series of overlapping circumstances which apparently are meant to induce and sustainlong-term extremes of stress. All of these individuals have been effectively isolated. Unethical psychiatristsand physicians are involved in the majority of these cases. Mind-altering prescription drugs are being usedfor clearly non-therapeutic purposes. Evidence of LSD use is also beginning to surface (one of Cameron'sfavored mind-altering substances). And "psychic driving" techniques – Cameron's pet brainwashing method– are involved in all these cases, to a much greater and more potentially effective degree where auditoryinput is involved. The long-term objectives of these harassment and experimentation campaigns appear to be quitefundamental; viz., (1) induce a sense of perverted "loyalty" toward the very agencies engaged in the individual's harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of obtaining legal redress might be concerned; (2) redirect the targeted individual's feelings of hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and ethnic groups, and toward select, prominent political figures, to include the President of the United States; (3) force the individual to commit an act of violence, whether suicide or murder, under conditions which he can be plausibly denied by the government. An operation's ultimate success apparently hangs on this latter objective. We have successfully obstructedthis process in a number of cases now being investigated. THE "STALKER" PHENOMENON
In recent weeks, considerable publicity has been given the trauma of the victim's of "stalkers" (personswho obsessively surveil, harass and, in some cases, kill targeted individuals for assorted, unfathomable rea-sons). Movie stars that have been stalked recurrently make the news. Stalking, as a problem, is in factbecoming widespread, to a point where, in some States, the activity has finally been specifically proscribedby law.
The individuals in contact with our Association are reporting the same terrifying ranges of experiences asare now being reported by the press on behalf of other victims stalkers. The only difference in the casesreported to us is that the stalkers operate in groups over extremely long periods of time, and (it wouldappear) with the blessings of certain agencies of the U.S. Government. The laws being passes to protectvictims of stalkers are clearly being selectively applied. We hope to put an end to this situation; that is, inaddition to achieving the objects discussed above. It should be noted that the FBI, though unwilling to intervene in the cases described above recently inter-vened on a massive scale to protect Joy Silverman, a Bush-appointed trustee of the J.F. Kennedy Center forthe Performing Arts, from the ardent "stalkings" of her estranged paramour, Sol Wachtler, Chief Justice,Court of Appeals in the State of New York.(12) Wachtler had apparently threatened to kidnap Silverman's daughter if not paid $20,000. Since no kidnap-ping had occurred, the case qualified merely as an attempted extortion, a question arises as to why the NewYork State Police could not have handled this investigation. Mr. Silverman resides in New York. It would appear that the FBI devoted more than 100 agents and technicians to the effort, resolving the casewithin approximately 30 days. On November 7, 1992, the day of his arrest, Wachtler ran a gauntlet of 80FBI special agents on the Long Island Expressway. Apparently the FBI does not have enough to do, if stak-ing out a lone stalker is their top priority. We have to wonder, of course, if the FBI's massive response wasprompted by what was perceived to be Wachtler's usurpation of governmental stalking prerogatives. Mrs. Silverman's $300,000 donation to Republican Party causes could be considered a basis for the FBI'ssolicitous concern for her welfare. It would appear, under the circumstances, that the "stalking victims" dis-cussed above – being by now poverty-stricken – should abandon all hope of FBI intervention in theirrespective situations. FBI protection appears to have a price tag, which not one of our contacts can afford. Footnotes
1. Peters, Edward, Torture, Basil Blackwell, Inc., New York/London, 1985 2. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, OH, June 28, 1991, p.4-B ("Psychiatrist Testifies at mom's Hearing"); November 6, 1991, ("Woman Ruled Competent for Trial"); and December 21, 1991, p. 4-C ("RulingExpected Monday on Sanity of Parma Mother/Woman says she stabbed her 3 children to protect them"). 3. The Washington Post, June 1, 1991, p. C-1 ("Voices' Led to Tragedy for 2 Men/Pentagon Suspect's Mother Says Institutions Should Have Held Son") and December 14, 1991, p. D-3 ("Suspect in PentagonKilling Is Found Unfit to Stand Trial"). 4. The Washington Post, September 4, 1992, p. D-3 ("Freight Train kills Woman Near Home in Silver 5. Jane's Security and Co-In [Counter-Insurgency] Equipment, (Surrey, UK, 1991-92), as a preliminary source, contains a number of references to attache-case concealment devices, for use insurveillance/communications operations. The electronic components are built into the bottom interior ofthese cases. Obviously the man just described could not have carried a "microcircuitried" attache caseaboard a U.S. airliner without first clearing security. We were advised by a former CIA DDS (Security)employee that credential-carrying members of U.S. Intelligence can bypass airport security checks oftheir carry-on luggage. 6. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, October 15, 1986, p. 1-A ("U.S. Used Humans for Radiation Guinea Pigs"). 7. See, for example, Weinstein, Harvey M., M.D., Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C., 1990; Marks, John, The Search for the "ManchurianCandidate" The CIA and Mind Control, Times Books, New York, 1979; Delgado, Jose M. R., M.D.,Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society, Harper & Row, New York, 1969; andHutchison, Michael, Megabrain: New Tools and Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion,Ballantine Books, New York, 1986. 8. According to a Vancouver Sun archivist, Hollywood Hospital, Ltd. (a privately-owned institution), went out of business in 1975, two years after this woman's hospitalization and after approximately 30 years ofdoing business. The event coincided with findings by the U.S. Senate Church Committee concerning theCIA's brainwashing experiments under MKULTRA. Our contact also identified the Director of theHollywood Hospital as Dr. Ross MacLean – information also confirmed by the Vancouver Sun. Nothingin these records, copies of which are being obtained, points to CIA involvement with the hospital.
Perhaps a portion of history has been overlooked. Cornell Medical Center's role in MKULTRA is a mat-ter of public record. (See, for example, Thomas, Gordon, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of theCIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, Bantam Books, New York, 1989). 9. The Roper Organization, Unusual Personal Experiences: An Analysis of the Data from Three National Surveys, (Bigelow Holding Corp., Las Vegas, NY, 1991. Contributors lending "credibility" to this publi-cation include John Mack and Budd Hopkins. 10. Defense Week, October 19, 1992, Vol. 13, No. 41, pp. I & II, ("Pentagon, State [Department] Collaborate on Counterterror Gear"). 12. The Washington Post, November 10, 1992, p. A-1 ("An Unlikely Suspect for Scandal/Top N.Y. Judge Accused of Breaking Law in Secret Life"). “There can never be any justification for torture. It creates an escalation ofviolence in the internal affairs of states. It spreads like a contagious diseasefrom country to country. It has lasting effects on the mental and physical healthof the victim and brutalizes the torturer. It is fundamental duty as human beingsto express what is surely the conscience of humanity and to eradicate this evil.” Amnesty International, February 1990, in the context of the U.S. Government's continuing failure to ratifythe U.N. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,dated December 10, 1984

Source: http://423.org.uk/McKinney%20Report.pdf