Microsoft word - hitec testimony press release 06.04.08.doc

CONTACT: Ashley Katz Executive Director, Patient Privacy Rights (512) 732-0033 or (512) 897-6390 www.patientprivacyrights.org PATIENT PRIVACY RIGHTS TESTIFIES BEFORE HOUSE ENERGY & COMMERCE ON Congress: Protect in statute what Americans assume happens when they visit their
doctors: that what they “say in the doctor’s office stays in the doctor’s office.”
Washington, D.C. -- Dr. Deborah Peel, founder and chair of Patient Privacy Rights and leader of the bipartisan Coalition for Patient Privacy testifies today before the House Energy & Commerce Committee, Subcommittee on Health, and makes privacy recommendations for the new draft Health IT bill, “HITEC.” We ask Congress to ensure both progress and privacy in Patient Privacy Rights is urging Congress to include the definition of privacy and restore Americans’ right to consent to the use and disclosure of their personal information. The definition of privacy is “an individual's right to control the acquisition, uses, or disclosures of his With electronic health records, the risk to patient privacy is real. Existing laws do not go far enough. Today, 4 million providers and their employees decide when, where, and who gets your sensitive health data, not you, and electronic systems are not secure. Meanwhile Americans’ personal health information is worth billions. It is the perfect storm for massive privacy violations that will ultimately lead to discrimination by employers, insurers, banks and It has been puzzling to encounter opposition to privacy; it is a right that is centuries old. “It is not a radical notion,” remarked Peel. Privacy means control over personal information— Including the right to control who can view and use your health information is another imperative for HITEC. “Getting consent to disclose your diagnosis of cancer, an STD, a Paxil prescription or even having the flu is not radical. In fact, obtaining consent is even easier with health IT,” said Peel. Some have argued that getting consent today is burdensome or impractical. Peel addressed this head on: “If you believe that you are saying it is O.K. for the health industry to not even try to communicate with their customers, and it is O.K. to let those who have the most to gain decide how personal information is used. Well, that’s not O.K. Destroying the bond of trust between physicians and patients that has worked for millennia is the one radical concept of this debate.” Patient Privacy Rights also urges Congress not to delegate to committees the power to change Americans’ long-standing rights to health privacy. It is critical that Congress, the body accountable to voters, set the basic framework for Health IT and our fundamental privacy rights. The lack of privacy is both harmful and deadly. According to HHS, two million mentally ill Americans do not seek treatment for this
reason.1
600,000 cancer victims do not seek early diagnosis and treatment.2
Millions of young Americans suffering from sexually transmitted diseases do not seek . .
.treatment.3
The California Health Care Foundation found that 1 in 8 Americans have put their health
at risk for the sake of privacy: Avoiding their regular doctor - Asking a doctor to alter a
diagnosis- Paying privately for a test - Avoiding tests altogether.4

The Rand Corporation found that 150,000 soldiers suffering from PTSD do not seek
treatment because of privacy concerns.5
4 CHCH Consumer Health Privacy Survey, June 2005 5 "Invisible Wounds of War", The RAND Corp., p. 436 (2008) These statistics are unacceptable. Patient Privacy Rights urges the House to protect the most sensitive information on earth, our health records. About Patient Privacy Rights: Patient Privacy Rights is a national organization that educates consumers about the importance of health privacy, champions smart policies, and holds industry accountable to protect what’s most valuable—our health, our families and our reputation. PPR is headquartered in Austin, Texas. For more information visit www.patientprivacyrights.org

Source: http://patientprivacyrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HITECH_Testimony_Press_Release_06.04.08.pdf

Problem prescriptions in sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing

Available online at www.sciencedirect.comProblem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contactAnders Ekedahl, M.Sc.(Pharm.), Ph.D.(Med. aR&D department, National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies (Apoteket AB), Apoteket Lejonet,bSchool of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, SwedenBackground: Pharmacists have an important role in detecting, preventing, and

Ipcd policy number 13

CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Disclaimer When using this document please ensure that the version you are using is the most up to date either by checking on the Trust database for any new versions or if the review date has passed please contact the author. OUT OF DATE POLICY DOCUMENTS MUST NOT BE RELIED ON Vancomycin r

Copyright © 2013-2018 Pharmacy Abstracts